The Modified Fels and Abbreviated Modified Fels Knee Skeletal-Maturity Systems in the Prediction of Leg-Length Discrepancy.

BACKGROUND: The Modified Fels (mFels) and Abbreviated Modified Fels (abFels) knee systems have been recently developed as options for grading skeletal maturity without the need for a separate hand radiograph. We sought to determine the interobserver reliability of these systems and to compare their prediction accuracy with that of the Greulich and Pyle (G-P) atlas in a cohort managed with epiphysiodesis for leg-length discrepancy (LLD). METHODS: Three reviewers scored 20 knee radiographs using the mFels system, which includes 5 qualitative and 2 quantitative measures as well as a quantitative output. Short leg length (SL), long leg length (LL), and LLD prediction errors at maturity using the White-Menelaus (W-M) method and G-P, mFels, or abFels skeletal age were compared in a cohort of 60 patients managed with epiphysiodesis for LLD. RESULTS: Intraclass correlation coefficients for the 2 quantitative variables and the quantitative output of the mFels system using 20 knee radiographs ranged from 0.55 to 0.98, and kappa coefficients for the 5 qualitative variables ranged from 0.56 to 1, indicating a reliability range from moderate to excellent. In the epiphysiodesis cohort, G-P skeletal age was on average 0.25 year older than mFels and abFels skeletal ages, most notably in females. The majority of average prediction errors between G-P, mFels, and abFels were <0.5 cm, with the greatest error being for the SL prediction in females, which approached 1 cm. Skeletal-age estimates with the mFels and abFels systems were statistically comparable. CONCLUSIONS: The mFels skeletal-age system is a reproducible method of determining skeletal age. Prediction errors in mFels and abFels skeletal ages were clinically comparable with those in G-P skeletal ages in this epiphysiodesis cohort. Further work is warranted to optimize and validate the accuracy of mFels and abFels skeletal ages to predict LLD and the impact of epiphysiodesis, particularly in females. Both the mFels and abFels systems are promising means of estimating skeletal age, avoiding additional radiation and health-care expenditure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level II . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Ipsilateral Healthy-segment Response to Leg Length Discrepancy.

BACKGROUND: Few studies address frequency or magnitude of healthy lower-extremity segment response to ipsilateral companion segment shortening. We sought to document and quantify this occurrence in a variety of pediatric etiologies. METHODS: We reviewed the medical record and radiographs of patients undergoing epiphysiodesis to manage leg length discrepancy. Inclusion criteria for this study were leg length discrepancy of a single lower-extremity segment by identifiable cause and adequate scanograms to allow accurate measurement of all 4 lower-extremity segments before any surgical treatment for the discrepancy. We recorded the etiology of shortening, age of onset of disorder, the length of the lower-extremity segments on scanograms, and age at the time of radiographs. We considered ipsilateral healthy-segment difference from the contralateral ≥ 0.5 cm. as clinically significant. RESULTS: Two hundred nine patients met inclusion criteria (126 boys, 83 girls). The average age was 12.5 years. 16/60 patients with avascular necrosis of the hip demonstrated ipsilateral tibial shortening averaging 1.2 cm whereas 6/60 demonstrated ipsilateral tibial overgrowth averaging 0.6 cm. 11/30 Legg-Perthés patients demonstrated ipsilateral tibial shortening averaging 0.7 cm; none had ipsilateral tibial overgrowth. 10/42 posteromedial bow patients had ipsilateral femoral shortening averaging 0.8 cm, whereas 6/42 had ipsilateral overgrowth averaging 0.8 cm. 13/48 with distal femoral physeal injury demonstrated ipsilateral tibial shortening averaging 1.2 cm, whereas 6/48 demonstrated ipsilateral tibial overgrowth averaging 0.8 cm. 8/29 tibial physeal injuries (proximal or distal) demonstrated ipsilateral femoral shortening averaging 1.1 cm. whereas 7/29 demonstrated ipsilateral femoral overgrowth averaging 0.7 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Although there are individual exceptions, the ipsilateral healthy segment does not grow appreciably more than the contralateral in patients with avascular necrosis of the hip, Legg-Perthés disease, or physeal trauma. The femur is not a significant component of shortening in patients with posteromedial bow. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III, retrospective review.

Clinical and Radiographic Assessment of Adult Function After Blount Disease in Childhood: An Exercise in Futility.

BACKGROUND: Few studies evaluate long-term function of patients with Blount disease. We sought to document patient radiographic and functional status 20 to 30 years after sugical treatment for infantile or adolescent Blount disease. METHODS: We reviewed the medical records and radiographs of patients operated at our institution for Blount disease between 1985 and 1995. Over a 4-year period, we recruited subjects for an IRB-approved call-back study. RESULTS: One hundred five patients were eligible for the call-back study. Thirty-one (30%) had a criminal record, 18 of sufficient gravity to preclude invitation to return. Of the remaining 87, 40 (46%) could not be contacted. Of 47 with valid contact information, 10 (21%) were reported as deceased (although this could not be objectively confirmed), 20 (43%) did not respond or failed to show for assessment, and 1 (2%) declined to participate. 16 subjects returned at average age 36, 22 to 31 years post-index surgery. Body mass index (BMI) averaged 45.8 (range 23.9 to 67.6). Physical Score correlated most strongly and inversely with BMI ( P <0.01). Satisfaction with life correlated strongly and inversely with mechanical axis deviation ( P =0.02) and radiographic osteoarthritis of the knee ( P =0.02), but not BMI. There also was no correlation between severity of radiographic osteoarthritis and mechanical axis deviation ( P =0.46) or BMI ( P =0.52). CONCLUSIONS: The small fraction of patients returning for evalutation minimize clinical conclusions that can be drawn from this study, despite an intensive 4-year effort to conduct it. Management of obesity and other socioeconomic characteristics are likely the most important aspects of treatment of patients with Blount disease. Our primary conclusion is that meaningful long-term functional studies of pediatric orthopaedic conditions will not be answered by retrospective call-back studies, and must be conducted within prospective registries and regular longitudinal follow-up. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III-Case-controlled study.

Faster Rate of Correction with Distal Femoral Transphyseal Screws Versus Plates in Hemiepiphysiodesis for Coronal-Plane Knee Deformity: Age- and Sex-Matched Cohorts of Skeletally Immature Patients.

BACKGROUND: Hemiepiphysiodesis (guided-growth) procedures have become the primary method of treatment for coronal-plane knee deformities in skeletally immature patients. Two leading techniques involve the use of a transphyseal screw or a growth modulation plate. However, clinical references for the estimation of correction are lacking, and no consensus has been reached regarding the superiority of one technique over the other. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to compare the rates of correction for distal femoral transphyseal screws and growth modulation plates in age- and sex-matched cohorts with coronal deformities. METHODS: Thirty-one knees were included in each cohort on the basis of propensity scoring by chronological age and sex, and radiographic images were retrospectively reviewed preoperatively and postoperatively. Each case was measured for limb length, mechanical axis deviation (MAD), mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), and bone age. RESULTS: Both the MAD and LDFA rate of correction significantly differed between the screw and plate cohorts. The MAD rate of correction was observed to be 0.42 ± 0.37 mm/week (1.69 mm/month) in the plate cohort and 0.66 ± 0.51 mm/week (2.64 mm/month) in the screw cohort. The LDFA rate of correction was observed to be 0.12° ± 0.13°/week (0.50°/month) in the plate cohort and 0.19° ± 0.19°/week (0.77°/month) in the screw cohort. CONCLUSIONS: The current study provides simple clinical references for the rate of correction of MAD and the LDFA for 2 methods of hemiepiphysiodesis. The results suggest that transphyseal screws may correct coronal knee deformities during the initial treatment stage more quickly than growth modulation plates in distal femoral guided growth. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of "Human" and Artificial Intelligence Hand-and-Wrist Skeletal Age Estimation in an Epiphysiodesis Cohort.

BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated that the White-Menelaus arithmetic formula combined with skeletal age as estimated with the Greulich and Pyle (GP) atlas was the most accurate method for predicting leg lengths and residual leg-length discrepancy (LLD) at maturity in a cohort of patients treated with epiphysiodesis. We sought to determine if an online artificial intelligence (AI)-based hand-and-wrist skeletal age system provided consistent readings and to evaluate how these readings influenced the prediction of the outcome of epiphysiodesis in this cohort. METHODS: JPEG images of perioperative hand radiographs for 76 subjects were independently submitted by 2 authors to an AI skeletal age web site (http://physis.16bit.ai/). We compared the accuracy of the predicted long-leg length (after epiphysiodesis), short-leg length, and residual LLD with use of the White-Menelaus formula and either human-estimated GP or AI-estimated skeletal age. RESULTS: The AI skeletal age readings had an intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.99. AI-estimated skeletal age was generally greater than human-estimated GP skeletal age (average, 0.5 year greater in boys and 0.1 year greater in girls). Overall, the prediction accuracy was improved with AI readings; these differences reached significance for the short-leg and residual LLD prediction errors. Residual LLD was underestimated by ≥1.0 cm in 26 of 76 subjects when human-estimated GP skeletal age was used (range of underestimation, 1.0 to 3.2 cm), compared with only 10 of 76 subjects when AI skeletal age was used (range of underestimation, 1.1 cm to 2.2 cm) (p < 0.01). Residual LLD was overestimated by ≥1.0 cm in 3 of 76 subjects by both methods (range of overestimation, 1.0 to 1.3 cm for the human-estimated GP method and 1.0 to 1.6 cm for the AI method). CONCLUSIONS: The AI method of determining hand-and-wrist skeletal age was highly reproducible in this cohort and improved the accuracy of prediction of leg length and residual discrepancy when compared with traditional human interpretation of the GP atlas. This improvement could be explained by more accurate estimation of skeletal age via a machine-learning AI system calibrated with a large database. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Outpatient Bryant's Overhead Traction Does Not Affect the Rate of Open Reduction or Avascular Necrosis in Developmental Dislocation of the Hip.

BACKGROUND: The efficacy of preliminary traction to increase the likelihood of closed reduction and/or decrease the incidence of avascular necrosis in the management of developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is controversial. We sought to document compliance with and effectiveness of Bryant's outpatient traction in patients with idiopathic DDH. METHODS: Patients presenting between 6 and 24 months of age with idiopathic irreducible DDH were prospectively enrolled in the study. Prereduction outpatient traction was prescribed at participating surgeons' preference and parents' expressed willingness to comply with a traction protocol of at least 14 hours/day for 4 weeks. Traction hours were documented using a validated monitor; parents also reported average daily usage. Rate of successful closed reduction and evidence of capital epiphyseal growth disturbance 1 year' and 2 years' postreduction were documented. RESULTS: Ninety-six patients with 115 affected hips were enrolled. Reliable recorded traction hours were obtained in 31 patients with 36 affected hips. Defining compliance as 14 hours/day average use, 14 of 31 patients (45.2%) were compliant, 2 (6.5%) admitted noncompliance, while 15 (48.2%) claimed to be compliant, but were not. Overall, 68/115 hips (59.0%) were closed reduced. Age at treatment was the only demographic characteristic associated with an increased incidence of closed reduction (11.7 vs. 14.6 mo, P<0.01). Successful closed reduction was achieved in 10/16 hips (62.5%) of compliant patients, 12/20 (60.0%) of noncompliant patients, and 43/72 (59.7%) of no-traction patients. Irregular ossific nucleus development was noted 1-year postindex reduction in 5/16 (31.3%) of complaint-patient hips and 25/92 (27.2%) of noncomplaint and no-traction hips. Distorted proximal femoral epiphysis was noted at 2 years postreduction in 2/15 hips (13.3%) of compliant patients and 15/52 hips (28.8%) in noncompliant and no-traction patients. None of these differences was statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Parent-reported use of outpatient traction is unreliable. Four weeks of outpatient overhead Bryant's traction did not affect the rate of closed reduction or avascular necrosis in late-presenting DDH in this cohort. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II-prospective cohort.

Lower-Extremity Segment-Length Prediction Accuracy of the Sanders Multiplier, Paley Multiplier, and White-Menelaus Formula.

BACKGROUND: Several methods are available to estimate leg lengths at maturity to facilitate the determination of timing of epiphysiodesis. We compared the Paley multiplier, Sanders multiplier, and White-Menelaus methods in an epiphysiodesis-aged cohort. We assessed intra- and interrater reliability for Sanders skeletal stages and Greulich and Pyle atlas skeletal age. METHODS: Actual growth was recorded in healthy, unoperated femoral and tibial segments from an epiphysiodesis database. The predicted and actual lengths were compared with use of the Paley multiplier and White-Menelaus methods, Greulich and Pyle skeletal age, and the Sanders multiplier using Sanders stages. Intra- and interrater reliability were assessed in a separate group of 76 skeletal age films. RESULTS: The cohort included 148 femora and 195 tibiae in 197 patients. Femoral length at maturity was slightly underestimated by the Sanders multiplier and staging, was overestimated by the Paley multiplier and skeletal age, and was most accurately predicted with use of the White-Menelaus formula and skeletal age. All methods overestimated tibial length at maturity. The whole-leg prediction accuracy of the Sanders multiplier and White-Menelaus formula were comparable and were more accurate than that of the Paley multiplier. For Sanders skeletal staging, the interrater reliability varied from 0.86 to 0.88 and the intrarater reliability varied from 0.87 to 0.96. For Greulich and Pyle skeletal age, the interrater reliability varied from 0.87 to 0.89 and the intrarater reliability varied from 0.91 to 0.95. CONCLUSIONS: Use of the Sanders multiplier and skeletal stages was more accurate than the Paley multiplier and skeletal age in this cohort. Use of the White-Menelaus formula and skeletal age was slightly more accurate in predicting femoral length and slightly less accurate in predicting tibial length compared with the Sanders multiplier. Intra- and interrater reliability were similar between Sanders skeletal stages and Greulich and Pyle atlas skeletal age. The White-Menelaus formula and skeletal age was the recommended method for predicting lower-extremity segment lengths at maturity and epiphysiodesis effect. Although easier to recall without referencing an atlas and not sex-specific, Sanders skeletal staging does not correspond directly to years of growth remaining, and thus cannot be used with the White-Menelaus formula. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The Greulich and Pyle atlas to determine skeletal age and the White-Menelaus formula to determine growth remaining are reliable predictors of epiphysiodesis effect in the lower extremities.

Incidence and significance of findings on spinal MRIs in a paediatric population with spinal column complaints.

PURPOSE: We sought to identify correlations between working diagnosis, surgeon indication for obtaining spinal MRI and positive MRI findings in paediatric patients presenting with spinal disorders or complaints. METHODS: Surgeons recorded their primary indication for ordering a spinal MRI in 385 consecutive patients. We compared radiologist-reported positive MRI findings with surgeon response, indication, working diagnosis and patient demographics. RESULTS: The most common surgeon-stated indications were pain (70) and coronal curve characteristics (63). Radiologists reported 137 (36%) normal and 248 (64%) abnormal MRIs. In total, 58% of abnormal reports (145) did not elicit a therapeutic or investigative response, which we characterized as 'clinically inconsequential'. In all, 42 of 268 (16%) presumed idiopathic scoliosis patients had intradural pathology noted on MRI.Younger age (10.3 years versus 12.0 years) was the only significant demographic difference between patients with or without intradural pathology. Surgeon indication 'curve magnitude at presentation' was associated with intradural abnormality identification. However, average Cobb angles between patients with or without an intradural abnormality was not significantly different (39° versus 37°, respectively). Back pain without neurological signs or symptoms was a negative predictor of intradural pathology. CONCLUSION: Radiologists reported a high frequency of abnormalities on MRI (64%), but 58% of those were deemed clinically inconsequential. Patients with MRI abnormalities were two years' younger than those with a normal or inconsequential MRI. 'Curve magnitude at presentation' in presumed idiopathic scoliosis patients was the only predictor of intrathecal pathology. 'Pain' was the only indication significantly associated with clinically inconsequential findings on MRI. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Is Proximal Fibula Epiphysiodesis Necessary When Performing a Proximal Tibial Epiphysiodesis?

BACKGROUND: Controversy exists regarding the need for proximal fibular epiphysiodesis in conjunction with proximal tibial epiphysiodesis to prevent relative overgrowth of the fibula. The purpose of this study was to determine the incidence of relative fibular overgrowth in patients who had undergone proximal tibial epiphysiodesis with or without proximal fibular epiphysiodesis to manage leg-length discrepancy. METHODS: We identified patients who had undergone proximal tibial epiphysiodesis, with or without concomitant fibular epiphysiodesis, followed to skeletal maturity, and with adequate scanograms to measure tibial and fibular lengths. We assessed tibial and fibular lengths, ratios, and distances between the tibia and fibula proximally and distally preoperatively and at skeletal maturity, and obvious radiographic proximal migration of the fibular head. RESULTS: A total of 234 patients met inclusion criteria, including 112 girls and 122 boys. In total, 179 patients had undergone concomitant fibular epiphysiodesis, and 55 had not. The fibular epiphysiodesis group was significantly younger preoperatively than the nonfibular epiphysiodesis group (average: 12.3 vs. 13.6 y), which accounted for most of the preoperative differences noted between the groups. Within the subset of younger patients (≥2 y of growth remaining at the time of epiphysiodesis), there were statistically significant differences between those with or without fibular epiphysiodesis at skeletal maturity in the proximal tibial-fibular distance (P<0.01) and the tibia:fibula ratio (0.96±0.02 vs. 0.98±0.02; P<0.02), but not in the distal tibial-fibular distance (P=0.46). Obvious fibular head proximal migration was noted in 10 patients, including 5/179 with concomitant proximal fibular epiphysiodesis, and 5/55 without (P<0.01). No patient was recorded as symptomatic with radiographic overgrowth, and no peroneal nerve injury occurred in any patient in this cohort. CONCLUSIONS: On the basis of this study, concomitant proximal fibular epiphysiodesis does not appear to be necessary in patients with 2 years or less of growth remaining, nor does it unequivocally prevent fibular head overgrowth. While the tibia:fibula ratio was quite consistent in general, there were individuals with relative fibular head prominence for whom fibular epiphysiodesis may be appropriate, particularly in relatively immature patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III-retrospective comparative study.

Staged Reconstruction for Type IV Tibial Deficiency (Distal Tibiofibular Diastasis): A Report of 2 Cases.

CASE: Congenital tibiofibular diastasis is a relatively rare form of limb deficiency, characterized by distal tibial tapering, absent ankle mortise, equinovarus foot deformity, and variable lower leg shortening. Treatment described has ranged from various forms of foot centralization with or without leg lengthening to amputation. We describe 2 cases treated in childhood by staged foot centralization by soft-tissue distraction, distal tibiotalar fusion, tibial lengthening, and subsequent limb length discrepancy equalization. At skeletal maturity, both patients ambulated independently without aid. CONCLUSIONS: Staged reconstruction with foot centralization and distal tibiotalar fusion is an option for carefully selected patients with tibiofibular diastasis who refuse foot ablation.

Amputation Versus Staged Reconstruction for Severe Fibular Hemimelia: Assessment of Psychosocial and Quality-of-Life Status and Physical Functioning in Childhood.

BACKGROUND: Fibular hemimelia, a congenital disorder characterized by the partial or complete absence of the fibula, tibial growth inhibition, and foot and ankle deformity and deficiency, is the most common deficiency of long bones. The purpose of the present study of children with congenital fibular hemimelia was to examine the functional and psychosocial outcomes at a minimum of 2 years after treatment either with amputation and a prosthesis or with reconstruction and lengthening. METHODS: Twenty children who were managed with primary amputation were compared with 22 children who were managed with staged limb reconstruction. The average age of the patients at the time of evaluation was 9 years (range, 5 to 15 years). Patients and parents completed psychosocial, quality-of-life, and satisfaction surveys. Patients underwent instrumented gait analysis and a timed 25 or 50-yard dash. The number and nature of surgical procedures were recorded from a retrospective chart review. RESULTS: Families of children managed with amputation had lower economic and educational levels and were more ethnically diverse compared with the families of children managed with limb reconstruction. Scores on psychosocial and quality-of-life surveys were comparable with those from healthy patient populations. Parents of males treated with amputation perceived a lower school-related quality of life for their child; socioeconomic and ethnic differences between groups might account for this finding. Statistically but not clinically significant differences were measured during instrumented gait analysis at a self-selected walking speed and during a timed 25 or 50-yard dash. The majority of patients and parents reported satisfaction with the treatment method selected and would select the same treatment method again. CONCLUSIONS: At this interim stage of growth, there were no significant functional or psychological differences between groups. Both groups were satisfied with the outcome in mid-childhood, irrespective of the selection of amputation or limb reconstruction. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Comparison of Anderson-Green Growth-Remaining Graphs and White-Menelaus Predictions of Growth Remaining in the Distal Femoral and Proximal Tibial Physes.

BACKGROUND: Epiphysiodesis of the distal femoral and/or proximal tibial physes is commonly performed in children and adolescents to treat lower-limb length discrepancy. It is important to determine the amount of growth remaining in the physes of these patients. Two main methods are used to make this determination: the White-Menelaus arithmetic method, which assumes a consistent amount of growth per year until skeletal maturity, and the Anderson-Green growth-remaining charts, which diagram average growth per year ± 2 standard deviations. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate these apparently disparate predictions of growth remaining in a cohort of patients managed with epiphysiodesis. METHODS: From a database of patients managed with epiphysiodesis for lower-limb length discrepancy, we identified all healthy, unoperated leg segments with follow-up to skeletal maturity. We compared the amount of observed growth with the growth predicted by the White-Menelaus method and the Anderson-Green growth-remaining graphs, for both skeletal and chronological ages. RESULTS: A total of 441 healthy segments (201 femora and 240 tibiae) in 221 patients (105 boys and 116 girls) with an age range of 9.0 to 16.5 years at the time of epiphysiodesis were analyzed. We observed no relationship between the length percentile of the leg segments at the time of epiphysiodesis and the amount of growth that actually occurred. Growth in the distal femoral and proximal tibial physes was relatively constant (9 and 6 mm per year of skeletal growth, respectively). Skeletal age was a better predictor of growth remaining than chronological age for both methods of estimation. Although the distribution of growth remaining in the present study resembled the Anderson-Green growth-remaining charts, that distribution was not associated with the initial length of leg segments. CONCLUSIONS: The White-Menelaus method predicted the amount of growth remaining more accurately than the Anderson-Green growth-remaining charts. The distribution of growth remaining observed in the present study resembled that of the Anderson-Green growth-remaining graphs but was not predicted by the initial bone segment length. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present study found no positive association between the length percentile of leg segments and the amount of growth that occurred in an epiphysiodesis-age group. This finding can explain the comparative accuracy of the White-Menelaus method and the possible source of prediction errors in the straight-line graph and multiplier methods.

Recurrence After Surgical Intervention for Infantile Tibia Vara: Assessment of a New Modified Classification.

BACKGROUND: To propose a modified classification of infantile tibia vara based on the morphology of the metaphyseal/epiphyseal tibial slope that better correlates with treatment outcomes than the traditional Langenskiold classification. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 82 patients and 115 limbs that underwent surgery for infantile tibia vara over a 22-year period (1990 to 2012) at a single institution. A modified Langenskiold classification was applied to all patients preoperatively and the outcomes were assessed. The modified system created a 3-stage classification (types A, B, and C): type A has a partially lucent medial metaphyseal defect, with or without "beaking"; type B deformity has downward-sloping curvature of the lateral and inferior rim of a completely lucent metaphyseal defect, which then has an upslope at the medial rim, resembling a ski-jump, with no epiphyseal downward slope; type C has vertical, downsloping deformity of both the epiphysis and metaphysis, with no upward curvature projecting medially at the inferior extent, while the epiphysis slopes downward into the metaphyseal defect. RESULTS: Sixty-seven limbs did not develop recurrence following corrective osteotomy, whereas 48 limbs required at least 1 repeat surgery for recurrent deformity. Preoperative mechanical axis deviation, medial proximal tibial angle, lateral distal tibial angle, and body mass index did not differ significantly between those with recurrence and those with without. Mean age at surgery was significantly different for those who developed recurrence compared with those who did not. Patients without recurrence were 4.3 years of age (range, 2.4 to 10.3 y) compared with 6.2 years of age (range, 2.9 to 10.1 y) for those who recurred (P<0.01). Of patients who developed recurrent deformity, there were significantly more patients with type C changes (71.7%, P<0.01) then either type A (22.5%) or type B (20.7%). High rates of recurrence were seen for both Langenskiold stage III (50%) and stage IV (69.6%). CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with prior studies, age 5 seems to be a critical transition in the risk for recurrent deformity after tibial osteotomy. Extreme vertical sloping of the medial metaphyseal defect, as in some classic Langenskiold III lesions and more precisely described by type C in a newer, modified classification, carries a poor prognosis for successful correction by high tibial osteotomy alone or in combination with epiphysiolysis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level II.

Congenital Tibial Deficiency.

Congenital tibial deficiency is a rare condition characterized by partial to complete absence of the tibia, an intact but frequently overgrown fibula, variable degrees of knee deformity and function, and an abnormal equinovarus foot. It can occur in isolation but also presents concurrently with other orthopaedic anomalies and syndromic conditions. Among these, congenital abnormalities of the hand and femur are most commonly observed. Many theories exist regarding its etiology and some genetic mutations have been identified; however, the underlying mechanism remains unknown. The prognosis and treatment differ based on the clinical severity. The goal of treatment is always to create a stable, functional limb, most commonly with amputation and use of prosthetics. Controversy exists over the level of amputation and the usefulness of reconstructive procedures to preserve the foot and limb length. Current investigation on this complex disorder is focused on identifying its origins and further developing a classification-based treatment algorithm to improve patient outcomes.

Timing of Epiphysiodesis to Correct Leg-Length Discrepancy: A Comparison of Prediction Methods.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy of different methods used to predict ultimate leg lengths and residual leg-length discrepancy in a group of patients treated with epiphysiodesis at our institution. METHODS: Seventy-seven patients with adequate preoperative radiographs, no postoperative complications, and follow-up to skeletal maturity composed the study group. We compared the predicted lengths of both legs and residual leg-length discrepancy at maturity with actual outcomes using the White-Menelaus, Anderson-Green, Moseley, and multiplier methods. RESULTS: Skeletal age varied >1 year from chronological age in 61 (26%) of 231 observations, including 19 patients (25%) whose average skeletal age from 3 determinations differed by >1 year from chronological age. The prediction accuracy of each method was improved by using skeletal, rather than chronological, age. Error in prediction of the length of the short leg varied from a mean (and standard deviation) of 1.8 ± 1.2 cm for the straight-line graph to 2.5 ± 2.0 cm for the multiplier method. Prediction error for the long leg (after epiphysiodesis) varied from a mean of 1.2 ± 1.1 cm for the straight-line graph to 1.7 ± 1.5 cm for the multiplier method. Leg-length-discrepancy prediction error ranged from a mean of 0.7 ± 0.6 cm for the White-Menelaus method incorporating a growth inhibition factor to 1.1 ± 0.9 cm for the multiplier method. The multiplier method was the least accurate of all. All differences were significant. CONCLUSIONS: Determination of skeletal age is clinically relevant in patients being considered for epiphysiodesis to manage leg-length inequality. The multiplier method was the least accurate of the prediction methods in this patient population, which may have implications in calculating the appropriate timing of epiphysiodesis.

Complications Associated With Epiphysiodesis for Management of Leg Length Discrepancy.

BACKGROUND: Epiphysiodesis is well-established surgical treatment for the management of leg length discrepancy (LLD) in children; however, a variety of complications may occur. This study evaluates the nature, rate, and potential risk factors of complications associated with epiphysiodesis in a large patient population treated in 1 institution. METHODS: We evaluated the medical and radiographic records of 863 children who had lower extremity epiphysiodesis to manage LLD between 1980 and 2011. RESULTS: Sixty patients (7.0%) incurred complications of some type. Twenty-three patients (2.7%) had perioperative complications unrelated to physeal growth; all resolved without surgical treatment. These included 2 patients with transient intraoperative complications (laryngospasm and allergic rash), 7 with transient neurological symptoms (5 cutaneous nerve dysesthesia or numbness and 2 peroneal nerve neuropathies), and 14 with postoperative knee stiffness which resolved with therapy. Thirty-seven patients (4.3%) developed physeal growth-related complications, including 6 patients who developed overcorrection of leg length inequality (3 had contralateral epiphysiodesis to prevent overcorrection, while 3 declined), and 31 patients who developed angular deformity and/or continued growth of the physis. Of these 31 patients, 15 had reexploration of the epiphysiodesis site, 6 underwent corrective osteotomy, while in 10, no treatment was undertaken. Compared with patients who did not develop angular deformity, these 31 patients had significantly greater LLD (5.6 vs. 3.7 cm, respectively, P<0.01), were younger (10.7 vs. 11.7 in girls; 12.4 vs. 13.5 in boys; P<0.01), and were more likely to have a congenital etiology for their LLD (P<0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Epiphysiodesis is a safe and effective procedure for the correction of leg length inequality. The rate of complications in this study was 7.0%, the most prevalent being the development of angular deformity. Congenital etiology, younger age, and larger limb length inequalities were risk factors for the development of angular deformity. Both surgeons and families should be aware of nature and rate of complications associated with epiphysiodesis. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV.

A Brief History of Limb Lengthening.

In the last 35 years, orthopaedic surgeons have witnessed 3 major advances in the technique of limb lengthening: "distraction osteogenesis" facilitated by Gavriil Ilizarov method and infinitely-adaptable circular fixator with fine-wire bone fragment fixation; the introduction of the "6-strut" computer program-assisted circular fixators to effect complex deformity correction simultaneously; and the development of motorized intramedullary lengthening nails. However, the principles and associated complications of these techniques are on the basis of observations by Codivilla, Putti, and Abbott from as much as 110 years ago. This review notes the contribution of these pioneers in limb lengthening, and the contribution of Thor Heyerdahl principles of tolerance and diversity to the dissemination of Ilizarov principles to the Western world.

Growth Modulation in Achondroplasia.

INTRODUCTION: Achondroplasia is the most common skeletal dysplasia with a rate of nearly 1/10,000. The development of lower extremity deformity is well documented, and various modes of correction have been reported. There are no reports on the use of growth modulation to correct angular deformity in achondroplasia. METHODS: Medical Records from 1985 to 2015 were reviewed for the diagnosis of achondroplasia and growth modulation procedures. Patients who had been treated for angular deformity of the legs by growth modulation were identified. A detailed analysis of their medical record and preoperative and final lower extremity radiographs was completed. RESULTS: Four patients underwent growth modulation procedures, all to correct existing varus deformity of the legs. Three of the 4 patients underwent bilateral distal femoral and proximal tibial growth modulation. The remaining patient underwent tibial correction only. Two of the 4 patients had a combined proximal fibular epiphysiodesis. All limbs had some improvement of alignment; however, 1 patient went on to bilateral osteotomies. Only 1 limb corrected to a neutral axis with growth modulation alone at last follow-up, initial implantation was done before 5 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: Growth modulation is an effective means for deformity correction in the setting of achondroplasia. However implantation may need to be done earlier than would be typical for patients without achondroplasia. Osteotomy may still be required after growth modulation for incomplete correction.

Spectrum of Diagnosis and Disposition of Patients Referred to a Pediatric Orthopaedic Center for a Diagnosis of Intoeing.

BACKGROUND: Orthopaedic surgeons frequently evaluate otherwise healthy children for concern of intoed gait. Intoeing in otherwise healthy young children due to metatarsus adductus, internal tibial torsion, and increased femoral anteversion do not typically require orthopaedic treatment. This study reviewed the actual diagnosis, management, and disposition of patients referred to a pediatric orthopaedic specialty hospital for a diagnosis of intoeing; the efficacy of an Advanced Practice Provider (APP) assessment program to screen and triage patients with a primary complaint of intoeing; and parental satisfaction with that program. METHODS: We established an "Intoeing Clinic" conducted by APPs to conduct initial evaluations of patients referred for a diagnosis of intoeing meeting-specific criteria, including (1) a referring provider's diagnosis of "intoeing"; (2) the patient was under the age of 9 years; and (3) there was no suggestion of comorbidity in the information provided by the referring provider to imply a diagnosis other than "benign" intoeing. Under pediatric orthopaedic surgeon "on-call" supervision, APPs were authorized to perform clinical assessments supplemented by radiographs and laboratory investigations as deemed necessary. We performed an Institutional Review Board-approved, retrospective medical record review of all patients appointed to our Intoeing Clinic over a 30-month period (March 2010 to September 2013). RESULTS: About 95% of 926 patients appointed to APP Intoeing Clinic were confirmed to have a diagnosis of "benign" intoeing or a similar "benign" diagnosis; 5% of these patients requested a reevaluation for the same concern. Approximately 5% were determined to have a nonbenign diagnosis, either known to the family/provider, but not conveyed at the time of referral (4%), or identified at our institution (1%). Two patients (0.2%) were determined at follow-up examination to have a neurological abnormality at the subsequent examination. CONCLUSIONS: An "Intoeing Clinic" staffed by experienced Advanced Pediatric Practitioners or equivalent, with appropriate orthopaedic surgeon availability for consultation can be an effective and efficient method of evaluating patients referred for a diagnosis of "intoeing." LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-case series.

The Nature of Foot Ray Deficiency in Congenital Fibular Deficiency.

BACKGROUND: Absent lateral osseous structures in congenital fibular deficiency, including the distal femur and fibula, have led some authors to refer to the nature of foot ray deficiency as "lateral" as well. Others have suggested that the ray deficiency is in the central portion of the midfoot and forefoot.We sought to determine whether cuboid preservation and/or cuneiform deficiency in the feet of patients with congenital fibular deficiency implied that the ray deficiency is central rather than lateral in patients with congenital fibular deficiency. METHODS: We identified all patients with a clinical morphologic diagnosis of congenital fibular deficiency at our institution over a 15-year period. We reviewed the records and radiographs of patients who had radiographs of the feet to allow determination of the number of metatarsals, the presence or absence of a cuboid or calcaneocuboid fusion, the number of cuneiforms present (if possible), and any other osseous abnormalities of the foot. We excluded patients with 5-rayed feet, those who had not had radiographs of the feet, or whose radiographs were not adequate to allow accurate assessment of these radiographic features. We defined the characteristic "lateral (fifth) ray present" if there was a well-developed cuboid or calcaneocuboid coalition with which the lateral-most preserved metatarsal articulated. RESULTS: Twenty-six patients with 28 affected feet met radiographic criteria for inclusion in the study. All affected feet had a well-developed cuboid or calcaneocuboid coalition. The lateral-most ray of 25 patients with 26 affected feet articulated with the cuboid or calcaneocuboid coalition. One patient with bilateral fibular deficiency had bilateral partially deficient cuboids, and the lateral-most metatarsal articulated with the medial remnant of the deformed cuboids. Twenty-one of 28 feet with visible cuneiforms had 2 or 1 cuneiform. CONCLUSIONS: Although the embryology and pathogenesis of congenital fibular deficiency remain unknown, based on the radiographic features of the feet in this study, congenital fibular deficiency should not be viewed as a global "lateral lower-limb deficiency" nor the foot ray deficiency as "lateral." LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV-prognostic study.